For Medical Reviewers
Medical record review for mass tort, built around clinical judgment.
Pattern handles the high-confidence extraction and surfaces the records that need a clinical eye. You validate, confirm, and finalize. Every determination is documented and traceable.
.svg)
The Shift
How clinical review works at mass tort scale
Clinical reviewers on mass tort cases are not short on expertise. They are short on time. Too much of it goes toward locating the right records, sorting through irrelevant content, and re-reviewing work when criteria change.
Pattern structures that work before you open a case. The relevant records are surfaced. The data points are extracted. Your job is to apply your expertise to what the platform cannot determine on its own.
The Shift
The records you need, surfaced before you start
Guidance on what needs your attention
A workflow that tells you what to do next
Work that holds up at settlement
What this looks like in practice
How do nurse reviewers confirm injuries against litigation criteria?
A nurse reviewer logs into Pattern and opens their queue. The cases that need clinical attention are right there. Each one surfaces the relevant records, the extracted data points, and a clear view of what needs validation. There is no time spent figuring out where to start. The platform has done the structural work. The clinical work is yours.
.png?width=2000&name=Litigation%20Ops%20Arrow%20Graphic%20(1).png)
Part of one connected platform
Every determination you make in Pattern is part of a traceable record that carries through the litigation. When a submission is scrutinized at settlement, your work is documented, structured, and tied to the evidence. That traceability is not something you build. Pattern builds it as you work.