Evaluate every Roundup claim uniformly

Roundup claims are evaluated using a tier-based methodology that considers multiple factors, including qualifying injury, exposure type, age at diagnosis, treatment history, and medical risk factors.

Pattern processes claimant records and organizes these factors so firms can review each case consistently across their entire inventory. The platform extracts key data points such as lymphoma subtype, diagnosis date, exposure history, staging information, treatment records, and relevant medical conditions directly from claimant documents.

The qualifying diagnosis under the settlement is non-Hodgkin lymphoma, classified as Aggressive or Indolent. That classification is one of the three criteria that set tier, alongside exposure type and age at diagnosis. Diagnoses not on the qualifying list, including Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma, are non-qualifying.

Identifying the diagnosis is rarely a single-document exercise. Subtype, classification, and diagnosis date are often spread across pathology, hematology, and treating-physician records, and Pattern pulls them into one view with each value linked to the record behind it.

It separates the top of the tier structure from the bottom, and it turns on documentation rather than on what the claimant remembers. Occupational status requires a qualifying work capacity, a minimum number of exposure hours, and income evidence tied to that work, all of it documentary.

Most Roundup files were built before any of that mattered. Pattern shows which cases carry the occupational record and which do not, and names what each one is missing.

Pattern converts unstructured claimant documents into structured claimant profiles that consolidate exposure history, diagnosis information, treatment details, and medical risk factors.

This allows firms to review cases consistently and understand how their entire inventory aligns with the settlement criteria rather than reviewing cases one at a time.

As each claim is processed, the platform evaluates the status of key claim sections including exposure evidence, qualifying injury documentation, treatment records, and medical risk factors.

When required information is missing or inconsistent, Pattern flags the issue and provides guidance on what documentation or clarification may be needed before submission.

Pattern scores every open item in a claim as Critical, Major, or Minor and names the record needed to close it, then aggregates those items across the docket. A review manager can see that a group of cases is held up on occupational income evidence, assign the group, and send each reviewer to the field in question.

That shows which claims are supported by the record today, which are missing evidence the criteria require, and where documentation would let a file be evaluated on what is actually there.

Yes. Pattern organizes extracted data and supporting documentation into structured claimant profiles and generates standardized claim summaries.

These summaries can be exported individually or in bulk, allowing firms to generate claim documentation and internal work product efficiently as they prepare cases for submission.

AI proposes; your team disposes. Every value Pattern puts forward carries the document, page, and relied-on text behind it, and your reviewer accepts, edits, or rejects each one.

Marking a review step complete records the reviewer's work on that step. It does not assert that the package is complete or that the claim is eligible. Those are separate states, and Pattern keeps them separate.

Mass tort settlements often evolve as allocation rules and adjustment factors are finalized.

Pattern’s platform is configured around the settlement methodology and can update evaluation logic as new criteria are released. Because claim data is already structured, firms can update analysis across their entire inventory without manually reprocessing records.

Quick-Pay is a one-way election. Accepting it closes off every other award under the program, and only some claimants are eligible for it.

Pattern identifies which claimants are eligible, shows the supported evaluation path alongside the Quick-Pay path for each one, and flags the evidence still outstanding on the full-evaluation side. The election stays with your firm and your client.