Evaluate every Roundup claim against the full settlement criteria.

Roundup claims are evaluated using a tier-based methodology that considers multiple factors, including qualifying injury, exposure type, age at diagnosis, treatment history, and medical risk factors.

Pattern processes claimant records and organizes these factors so firms can review each case consistently across their entire inventory. The platform extracts key data points such as lymphoma subtype, diagnosis date, exposure history, staging information, treatment records, and relevant medical conditions directly from claimant documents.

Most Roundup claims involve diagnoses of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), including several recognized lymphoma subtypes. The settlement methodology distinguishes between aggressive and indolent forms of NHL and uses that classification as one of the factors used to determine tier placement.

Pattern extracts diagnosis information from pathology reports and medical records to help firms confirm qualifying injuries and identify the relevant lymphoma subtype for each claimant.

Roundup cases often contain extensive documentation. The average claimant file can include more than 1,300 pages of medical records, pathology reports, treatment histories, and exposure documentation.

Pattern processes these records automatically and extracts the key data required to evaluate each claim, allowing legal teams to review large inventories without manually reading every page of medical documentation.

Pattern converts unstructured claimant documents into structured claimant profiles that consolidate exposure history, diagnosis information, treatment details, and medical risk factors.

This allows firms to review cases consistently and understand how their entire inventory aligns with the settlement criteria rather than reviewing cases one at a time.

As each claim is processed, the platform evaluates the status of key claim sections including exposure evidence, qualifying injury documentation, treatment records, and medical risk factors.

When required information is missing or inconsistent, Pattern flags the issue and provides guidance on what documentation or clarification may be needed before submission.

Pattern provides inventory-level analytics that show claim readiness, documentation gaps, and claim distribution across the firm’s Roundup docket.

This visibility allows firms to identify which claims already meet settlement requirements, which require additional documentation, and where further work could improve tier placement before submission.

Yes. Pattern organizes extracted data and supporting documentation into structured claimant profiles and generates standardized claim summaries.

These summaries can be exported individually or in bulk, allowing firms to generate claim documentation and internal work product efficiently as they prepare cases for submission.

Pattern uses automated extraction models to identify key data points from claimant records, but all extracted information is presented to the firm’s reviewers for validation.

Reviewers can confirm diagnoses, exposure evidence, treatment details, and risk factors directly alongside the source documents to ensure accuracy before claims move forward in the review process.

Mass tort settlements often evolve as allocation rules and adjustment factors are finalized.

Pattern’s platform is configured around the settlement methodology and can update evaluation logic as new criteria are released. Because claim data is already structured, firms can update analysis across their entire inventory without manually reprocessing records.

Firms do not need to wait for final settlement deadlines before beginning claim evaluation. Starting early allows legal teams to organize claimant records, identify missing documentation, and understand how their inventory aligns with the settlement methodology.

Early analysis helps firms prepare stronger claims and avoid delays once the submission process begins.